Rep. Adam Schiff (CA), yesterday in his opening remarks to the Senate impeachment trial: “The president’s misconduct cannot be decided at the ballot box, for we cannot be assured that the vote will be fairly won” Another words, if Trump were to win (re)election in November, they cheated again……it was fixed again, there was Russian and/or Ukrainian election interference ………… again. That will be the Democrats story. What they really mean ‘they don’t trust you the American people (the voters). Schiff also stated again today that Trump is not a legit president. He mentioned Russian and Trump collusion again today. He still has not accepted the Mueller Report’s NO COLLUSION & NO OBSTRUCTION.
For two hours on Wednesday, we heard about Trump and Russian collusion…….. all over again; over and over again.
Trump is so far in Adam Schiff’s and Jerry Nadler’s head they must have nightmares, see visions of Trump and call out his name throughout the night.
Also we learned yesterday, Hunter Biden may be more relevant (to this impeachment) than the Democrats had claimed. Email(s) have exposed that Obama’s administration knew about Joe Biden’s conflict of interests and Hunter Biden’s position with corrupt Burisma. Remember, Joe withheld funds from the Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor and stopped the investigation of Burisma. There was enough concern that there was a meeting concerning Joe’s conflict. There is a list of names on a visitors check-in log at the White House with some interesting Ukrainian names. Its “believed” the Whistleblower (why wasn’t the WBlower worried about this corruption?) helped check these individuals in for a meeting at the WH concerning “the” conflict. So, OBAMA KNEW. This meeting at the WH was back in early 2016. Obama was trying to deal with it. Deal with it as in cover it up! This information is just breaking, as it was a story that suddenly came to a halt (late 2015- early 2016). This isn’t a conspiracy theory, this happened. We know the names on the list for the meeting at the WH were Ukrainian government officials.
So, Rep. Nadler, there is relevance to having a Hunter Biden called as a witness. JOE TOO! It is clear why Trump would have asked the Ukrainian president to ‘do “us” a favor. Look into Hunter and Joe Biden with Burisma, if you’re interested in cleaning up corruption’. Trump had every right to do so, especially if he had any information the Biden’s were/had been involved with a corrupt Burisma. If this were Trump and one of his sons, the Democrats would be all over him…………like they are now.
I nearly forgot, there may be some other names that come into play in this Ukrainian story. I’ll throw one out there, one I had already heard had a Ukraine connection; John Kerry ( and his step son).
Like I said, more on this to come, we (I) need more information, more documentation. There is a journalist, I believe his name is Ken Vogel (my spelling may be off) was all over this back in late 2015 – early 2016. Then things just came to a halt. Who put a halt to it? There is a news source I am following this through. I don’t want to reveal the source just yet, until more can be confirmed. The news source has documents (emails) confirming the story is real, how much there is to it is to be determined. However, what is known is significant.
So this is how the Deep State makes their money. The Biden and Clinton way!
Schiff and Nadler, especially Nadler slammed the Senate Republican’s with to paraphrase) “if you don’t do as the MANAGERS demand you are guilty of covering-up.”
Desperate people do desperate things. Desperate politicians say desperate things. Politicians in D.C. today, from within this Democratic Socialist Party say desperate things while on camera. It is a made for TV production. When you don’t get your way, and you have NO CASE, you take radical measures……… and you insult. Of course, insults are nothing new in the Senate or Congress. Normally we just don’t have a Supreme Court Chief Justice there to blow a whistle.
We’ll give you Hunter Biden for John Bolton? No major league general manager would even make that trade. You try to get something of equal value. Although Hunter would be entertaining.
How about Adam Schiff for John Bolton? Or Adam Schiff and the Whistleblower for Bolton? (I put them together in a little package since they are so relative to one another).
My true feelings. Don’t turn this impeachment trial into a trading game. If you can call one witness…….. all witnesses are free to call. Period.
This isn’t a game.
Everyone should see this. You don’t even need to watch in it’s entirety. Best argument you’ll see against the impeachment of Donald Trump.
I watched all 38 min., and was well worth my time.
On the impeachment of President Trump, Nancy Pelosi said, “it’s not a question of proof, it’s a question of allegations!”
Oh really?” @JudgeJeanine
Democrat’s strategy to convict: Trump must prove his innocence.
In a real court of law the accused must be PROVEN guilty by the prosecution. Hopefully one side of the political isle will get this right. We know the Democratic (Socialists) side will not along with a handful of Trump hating Republicans. We know Mitt (nitwit) Romney is so jealous of Trump’s victory in a presidential election……he is everything anti-Trump. He can’t stand it that Trump out-performs old political hang around antiques.
Pathetic injustice. If they’d do this to a president they’d do it to any of us. Just expose them for what they are.
No, Trump did not immediately give up the funds allocated by Congress to the Ukraine. But…….
When Trump did release the funds to the Ukraine, he did so within the time period. Trump actually had 19 more days left before he was obligated to release the funds.
The Democrats are much to do over nothing. So this whole impeachment scam is #1: a coup to remove Trump before the election in November of this year. They know they have no candidate capable of beating Trump. #2: They are protecting the Biden corruption machine. This is how the Swamp/Deep State works. The Deep State is in plain view. #3: They simply just hate Trump, he gets things done, where Democrats accomplish little to nothing.
From Wikipedia: In March 2019, during a speech in Conway, New Hampshire, Elizabeth Warren said, “Here’s the problem on term limits on folks in Congress — it makes them more dependent than ever on the lobbyist. Believe me, if the senators only stay for two terms, the lobbyist will be there a lot longer and they’ll know how the game is played.”
Guess what Elizabeth, the lobbyist already know how the game is played and they know the senators and representatives who know how its played as well. A term limitations law should also include a clause that U.S. Senators and Representatives from the House CAN NOT become a lobbyist after leaving office, at least for a specific number of years. (Currently senators must wait 2 years, representatives half that time, it isn’t long enough). Keep them out of the game players pockets.
Elizabeth’s justification of her opposition to term limitations makes no sense, except it could keep her in office longer. That is her more logical reason for opposition. Who is she kidding? She can’t give an honest answer on anything! THAT in itself is a single reason why term limitations is needed, to rid dishonest politicians like Elizabeth Warren.
If you favor term limitations, why would we vote for the likes of Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden. They have had plenty of terms in federal government, have been around for ever, and as Warren said ‘know how the game is played’. Best alternative to term limitations, if it isn’t an option (and for now it isn’t), STOP VOTING FOR THE SAME PEOPLE OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
I would also venture to say, if some of these people like Sanders, Warren and Biden were not eligible to run, we get more (better) candidates to run. These people that have been in Congress for many years have deeper money bags, making it difficult for newcomers (unless you are already a millionaire like Trump or Bloomberg). Bloomberg has been in politics for years as well. Trump was not.
I know that the presidency is a different office than Congress, and you’ll say the old hang-a-rounds like the three I mentioned should have a right to run. I’d say no, especially to the likes of a Joe Biden who has been in federal government for 40+ years. Talk about being in lobbyist’s pockets. We already know his ties to Ukraine and how his tenure has financially benefited him. I’d go so far to say after 12 years of combined time in a Congressional office, enough is enough. Time to go home!
I think it is possible to work up a form of term limitations that would keep people out of office after so many years in office. Keep them from bouncing around to avoid term limitations. Something to think about. Regardless vote!