arlin report thought(s) of the day: opinion vs. fact writing


Everyone (at least many) has/have an opinion. Not everyone has the facts. Many people write an opinion as fact, though they have no evidence or, giving them the benefit of the doubt, much knowledge of being fact. I realize I may not have stated that last sentence well, but I’ll say now that is my opinion. Confused yet?

One of the first blogs I read this morning was a total criticism of our most popular President ever (in my opinion). Criticism is fair, but it should be “fair” and it often is not. That my dear friends is a fact! Don’t believe me, just do a quick blogging post, there are plenty of examples out there. Opinions are written as factual in order to convince and sway the reader to the writers’ way of thinking. We find that even in the MSM today. I find that often irritating, and I either stop where I am……or check to see how much more rubbish I have to the finish, then decide how much more I want to endure.

If you write something, if it’s your opinion says it’s your opinion. We can write criticism on facts, and the reader should be able to tell it is opinion on the facts affect. To merely write things we have no evidence of should not be written as fact. If it is based on rumor, say so.

I often write my opinion, but I say it is my opinion or at least I mean to. Here this gets even better: I try to base my opinion from facts. Maybe I am not often clear either. I find those that hate Donald Trump (many do anyway) can’t say anything that isn’t negative. Some are true, some are not, but they still write them as facts. Steele Dossier comes to mind, you know that document Hillary Clinton paid for so the FISA court (and us) could accept as the truth. NOW THAT IS A FACT!

In my opinion.

KOMMONSENTSJANE – ARE THE DEMOCRATS/ BERNIE UNDER COVER AGENTS FOR PUTIN. — kommonsentsjane


Something smells about the Democrats/Bernie keep claiming that we are helping Putin; but everything in the past the Dem’s have accused the Repub’s for – it was because they were always claiming it was us. In the end, they were the guilty party. Bernie Sanders Wants All Your Money January 31, 2020 Bernie Sanders […]

KOMMONSENTSJANE – ARE THE DEMOCRATS/ BERNIE UNDER COVER AGENTS FOR PUTIN. — kommonsentsjane

US billionaire presidential candidate Bloomberg’s anti-women scandal — Dear Kitty. Some blog


This 15 February 2020 video from the USA says about itself: The DISGUSTING Thing Bloomberg Allegedly Said To A Pregnant Employee Mike Bloomberg’s record of attacking women mirror’s Trump’s. John Iadarola, Cenk Uygur, and Lindsey Ellefson hosts of The Young Turks, break it down. “In December 2015, employees at Everytown for Gun Safety, the gun […]

US billionaire presidential candidate Bloomberg’s anti-women scandal — Dear Kitty. Some blog

“What is Heaven Going to be Like?” — Revelation 21:1-22:5 — Proud to be TJ’s man


“That which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God” (Luke 16:15). In the Apostle John’s day, Rome was the admired city; yet God compared it to a harlot. Human history begins in a Garden and ends in a City that is like a garden paradise. The eternal city of God […]

“What is Heaven Going to be Like?” — Revelation 21:1-22:5 — Proud to be TJ’s man

can the president control the doj


https://www.law.ua.edu/lawreview/files/2018/12/1-Green-Roiphe-1-75.pdf

If you open and scan the above link (don’t even start to read unless you have the entire day) look for the following section, it seems to apply to the topic of the day.

I. LAW GOVERNING THE PRESIDENT’S ABILITY TO CONTROL
INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS

I had said in an earlier posts that Trump should just pardon Stone and Flynn. A reader suggested ‘why pardon? That requires an admission of guilt. Instead withdraw the case. ‘

I wondered if the President had the right to do so. Scholars apparently would argue whether he does or does not. It is my understanding he may have the right, but it would be highly controversial.

With today’s Democrats, criticizing everything Trump, can you imagine if Trump did withdraw the Stone and Flynn cases? LOL, Nancy and her ape shit House Dems would be back with an impeachment hearing next week. Its easy to do that now that there is no protocol.

this is okay…..because it's socialism


This is perfectly expected right? I mean come on people this is what socialists do. Not even those die hard Bernie supporters should be surprised by this, if they have any understanding of socialism at all. Get your point across at all costs. Hitler did it quite effectively. They try to destroy everything and everyone that opposes them. This is America under Sanders. You don’t hear him condemning it, do you? (Arlin Report)

Lead Juror In Roger Stone Trial Was Left-Wing Former Political Candidate Who Despises Trump; Buttigieg Wants Investigation Into Barr | ZeroHedge News — Truth2Freedom’s Blog


SO NOW BUTTIGIEG WANTS TO BE MORE LIKE ADAM SCHIFF. BUTTIGIEG WILL DO AND SAY ANYTHING FOR ATTENTION. THIS GUY WHO WAS ONLY A MAYOR, AND RUINED HIS CITY. (Arlin Report comment)

The lead juror in the Roger Stone trial is a former Democratic congressional candidate who hates President Trump, and actively posted anti-Trump material online during the trial, according to Cernovich.com and the Daily Caller. Tomeka Hart admitted to being a Stone trial juror in a Facebook post expressing outrage after four prosecutors withdrew from his […]

Lead Juror In Roger Stone Trial Was Left-Wing Former Political Candidate Who Despises Trump; Buttigieg Wants Investigation Into Barr | ZeroHedge News — Truth2Freedom’s Blog