KOMMONSENTSJANE – PANDERING FOR VOTES


Excellent Analysis!

kommonsentsjane

It is a shame that Hillary is using the Baltimore tragedy to pander for votes.  This is just one more signal that this woman has no shame.  Her Democratic Party has turned Baltimore into a jungle and she just doesn’t let up.  Even when the city is down on the ground groping for air she has no mercy – she continues to beat the drums of hate and division.

Peter King: Hillary ‘Off Mark,’ Gave ‘False Narratives’ in Race Speech

Thursday, 30 Apr 2015 01:48 PM

By Drew MacKenzie

Republican Rep. Pete King has slammed Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton’s criticism of race relations as she condemned a criminal justice system that she claims targets black communities.

The New York congressman says the former secretary of state’s remarks “were entirely off the mark” and she “ignored basic truths and perpetuated false narratives based on political correctness and liberal ideology.”

In…

View original post 936 more words

Advertisements

THUG AND THE STUPIDITY


A Thug is a thug……period, it isn’t the N-word as a city councilman in Baltimore claims it to be.   A thug is a single word that describes a persons action against its community, like looters, arsonists etc. etc. etc.   Here we go again……political correctness crap.

If you knock out a window intentionally, you are acting like a thug.   You loot, you are a thug.  Destroy property, THUG.   There are other words we could use, idiot, moron, social animal……on and on.

If you behave consistently in a manner of destruction, you are a THUG.

Don’t act offended when  you act offensively, it is what it is, and if you behave in a way that merits a one word description, you might be a THUG.

GOLDMAN AND THE CLINTON’S BOUGHT POLICY


GOLDMAN PAID BILL CLINTON $200K BEFORE LOBBYING HILLARY ON EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

Published: April 29, 2015
Share | Print This

SOURCE: ZERO HEDGE

As documented here on several occasions of late, there are new questions surrounding charitable contributions to the Clinton Foundation. Most notably, a Reuters investigation revealed that the Clinton family charities may have suffered what we called a “Geithner moment” when they failed to report tens of millions in contributions from foreign governments on tax documents. The foundation will now refile five years worth of returns and hasn’t ruled out the possibility that it may need to amend returns dating back some 15 years.

This prompted acting CEO Maura Pally to pen a lengthy blog post in which she explains the “mistakes” and attempts to reassure the public that the Clinton Foundation is taking special care to guard against “conflicts of interest” as Hillary begins her run for The White House. Pally also notes that similar measures were taken when Clinton was Secretary of State although, as we noted, the charity accepted donations from the likes of Kuwait, Qatar and Oman while she was the nation’s top diplomat.

Now there are new questions as IBTimes suggests there may be a connection between a $200,000 payment made to Bill Clinton by Goldman Sachs in 2011, and the bank’s efforts to lobby the State Department ahead of legislation involving the Export-Import Bank which was set to provide a loan that would end up financing the purchase of millions of dollars in aircraft from a company partially owned by Goldman. Here’s more:

Goldman Sachs paid former President Bill Clinton $200,000 to deliver a speech in the spring of 2011, several months before the investment banking giant began lobbying the State Department, then headed by Hillary Clinton, federal records reviewed by International Business Times show.

Goldman’s objective in lobbying the State Department could not be immediately discerned. The lobbying disclosure filings note only that Goldman sought to “monitor deficit reduction issues” — specifically, a bill known as the Budget Control Act — and the bank declined to answer questions about the precise nature of its interests…

In recent days, attention to overlapping interests that have donated to the Clinton family’s private interests while also allegedly seeking to influence State Department policy has reached a fever pitch amid leaks from a forthcoming book on the subject, “Clinton Cash,” by Peter Schweizer.

The involvement of Goldman Sachs seems certain to amplify that scrutiny. The bank brings a reputation as uniquely well-connected in Washington given that many of its former executives have landed in the uppermost ranks of the Treasury Department…

State Department records show that Bill Clinton’s $200,000 Goldman Sachs speech was delivered April 11, 2011, to “approximately 250 high level clients and investors” at a United Nations dining room in New York.

In federal disclosure documents, the Duberstein Group is listed as lobbying the Clinton State Department on behalf of Goldman Sachs between July and September 2011. Goldman Sachs paid the Duberstein Group $100,000 during that time.

Those records show that the firm was specifically lobbying the department on “proposed legislation” linked to a series of budget bills. One bill continued congressional authorization for the Export-Import Bank, a government-backed lender whose financing was critical for the prospects of a company in which Goldman owned a stake.

The original budget bill was introduced in July and did not include an extension of the Export-Import Bank, but the bank reauthorization was added in late September, during the same period Goldman was lobbying the State Department on the bill.

In August 2011, the bank authorized a $75 million loan enabling a Chinese firm to purchase aircraft from Beechcraft (known before emerging from bankruptcy in February 2013 as Hawker Beechcraft), a company that was part-owned by Goldman. Beechcraft had lobbied the Clinton State Department on issues relating to foreign military sales in 2009 and 2010, according to its lobbying disclosures.

Readers can draw their own conclusions here, and we don’t think it’s any surprise that Wall Street lobbyists wield considerable power in Washington, but the takeaway is that, as we’ve said on a number of occasions recently, you can expect to learn much, much more in the coming months about the degree to which the Clinton Foundation — and any other avenue through which foreign governments, Vampire squids, and a whole host of other state and non-state actors can channel money — is used as a means of buying influence with America’s maybe next President.

And because we can’t help ourselves, here is how we imagine Hillary would respond to the above:

Clinton Proposal Could Allow Feds to Ban Book Critical of Clinton Foundation | Washington Free Beacon


Clinton proposal? Who does she think she is, oh I know Hillary Clinton. So, now she is proposing a constitutional amendment that would keep publishers, authors from publishing books that criticize candidates. A book such as “Clinton Cash” that exposes the corruption of the Clinton’s. This is censorship, ripping us of our freedom of speech. This proves Hillary Clinton is a socialist, that will go to any extent to cover-up her’s and Bill’s corruption. Pure arrogance.

wwlee4411

View original post

JACKASSES IN FERGUSON RETURN, VIOLENCE DEFINES THEM


They say they are protesting in Ferguson in support of the protests in Baltimore.   Lets call it what it is “The continuation of unlawfulness by idiots in a high crime area”.    The pretentious protesters in Ferguson are only using the riots of Baltimore as a lame excuse.

Shots were fired, and at least one man was wounded.

These people have no cause except to act in a way that is already character within them.  It has become difficult to find new words to describe what is repeatedly happening in Ferguson.  As Hillary would say “It’s old news.”     It is the norm in Ferguson, and yes it now defines them.   When outsiders hear the name “Ferguson” what do they associate it with?  Violence and rioting, unlawfulness, that is Ferguson.

The only words I have, Ferguson, it’s the same old crap.

Hillary Clinton Hasn’t Paid Income Taxes In Ten Years!


It wouldn’t be shocking! She is certainly arrogant and CROOKED enough. This woman makes Nixon look like a Saint.

Desert Musings

It’s one thing when you see a politician that you like, and follow them, maybe even donate to their campaign, see them at a campaign stop, and of course, vote for them. Hell, you may even want to volunteer for the campaign. Take some neighbors to the polls, or burn up the phone lines urging undecided voters to pull the lever for your candidate.

It’s quite the other issue when your candidate hasn’t paid their income taxes in a decade and wants you to still believe they are the person for the job.

And when that person is running for president of the United States, it’s even more embarrassing than when IRS workers (and there are scads of them) haven’t paid their taxes. It’s not just embarrassing. It’s a damn shame. And the person ought to be thrown in jail.

So, did Hillary Clinton really not pay taxes for the…

View original post 390 more words