I don’t even know how to complete the above headline. After receiving my B.A. Degree with a major in Political Science in 1974, I took the Law Schools Admissions test. I do not remember what my score was from that beautiful Spring day, though it was long and wasted. I do know my score was not great but not poor. I did not pursue law school. Yesterday’s lecture at the coup hearing made me realize I made the right decision. Liberal law professors would have drove me insane. Yes they were even liberal back then. My professors in political science were also liberal. They had arrogant personalities. If you disagreed you were the one wrong, another words they were always right.
I was in college during the Nixon Watergate era. I had one class in which that is pretty much all we discussed was Nixon and Watergate, day after day. I was quiet most of the times, it was obvious there wasn’t a lot of love for Nixon in this class, especially from our professor. She hated Nixon. The class seemed to follow along with her wherever she may go. I liked Nixon, so I kept my mouth shut. I went to Missouri Southern State University in Joplin, MO. A very conservative area, except for those Political Science classes. I seemed to be the only one that did, I didn’t need to feel like i was taking part in a gang beating. I already felt it. My instructor wasn’t a law professor, but she carried the same arrogance as these law professors we saw yesterday.
Political Science is a weird field, they preach on the past but mix in present day ideas, political thought…….which is highly scattered and comes from scattered brains, who think they are just thinking out of the box.
Yesterday was interesting though, these law professors lectured us on the constitution and our founding fathers. They lectured us on what they meant when they created our Constitution, each article, each that came up anyway. So lectured us on what it meant, what the founding fathers were thinking and how the Constitution applied to today and especially that items were thought out to meet today’s issues in particular. So according to 3 of the 4 professors Donald Trump was the exact president the founding father’s addressed (had in mind) when the created our Constitution. They were protecting us from a Donald Trump (according to these 3 geniuses). What is interesting, these professors constantly criticize our constitution. If given the right, they would throw it out the window and re-write it or abolish it. Then they would just make their own laws. Liberal law professors are not the most democratic group around. They are hang out in our colleges and universities and poison our kids with extreme liberalism. Prof. Pamela S. Karlan is the poster child of a liberal law professor. No doubt about that. She is frightening. Do you really want to go to law school?
Originally posted on pundit from another planet: FISA Memo Is Scarier than Watergate. Victor Davis Hanson write: The Watergate scandal of 1972–74 was uncovered largely because of outraged Democratic politicians and a bulldog media. They both claimed that they had saved American democracy from the Nixon administration’s attempt to warp the CIA and FBI to cover up…
via The press used to uncover government wrongdoing. Today’s press is defending it. — Brittius
Mark Levin makes a strong case or argument that Obama ordered or in the least knew about wiretapping Trump Tower during the 2016 Campaign. I am not saying one way or the other, just yet, that the Donald’s claim of being spied on by Obama is true. That said is it impossible? Absolutely not! Is it beyond Obama to use government agencies to do his “possible” dirty work. NO! He is that arrogant and believes he is above the law. However, that said, it would be reckless to use gov agencies……someone sooner or later with any kind of conscience would squeal like a burning pig.
Stay tuned to this sequel as more is surely to be released. As of now, the jury is still out. Nothing should surprise you. Nixon’s Watergate started out with mere accusations as well. Look how that ended! In corrupt Washington D.C. anything is possible.
Watergate journalist Carl Bernstein comments on the FBI’s shocking Friday afternoon announcement that they are reopening the investigation into Hilary Clinton’s email server because new evidence has come to light.
via Bernstein: FBI Would Not Reopen Case Unless New Evidence Was “A Real Bombshell” — SATURDAY 10/29/16
It’s one thing for the right-wing press to accuse the Clinton foundation of cronyism, corruption, and scandal (especially if the facts, and internal admissions by affiliated employees, confirm as much) – it tends to be generally ignored by the broader, if left-leaning, media. But when the Watergate scandal’s Bob Woodward, associate editor at the liberal […]
via Watergate’s Bob Woodward: “Clinton Foundation Is Corrupt, It’s A Scandal” — peoples trust toronto
Watergate was petty compared to Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation’s corruption.
Bernie Sanders is acting like Hillary Clinton’s set-up man. He is just a body going through the motions of a presidential candidate, a practice run for Hillary, just a little taste of political bashing to warm her up.
If Sanders were serious about being president, he’d turn these mild to moderate attacks into an all out war. If there is anyone greater to target bombs and missiles at, it is Hillary Clinton. Hillary has a huge target on her back and front-side, you could attack from any angle. Bernie is going about his assault with white gloves, afraid to get them dirty. Bernie has no killer instinct.
Has Sanders been coached to only appear to be a contender? This is fake wrestling. Benghazi not an issue, an untouchable subject for the Democrats? The top secret, security threatened emails…….hardly a whimper. Just throw a bone in once in awhile, you know like Vince Foster, Whitewater, Clinton-Arkansas drug cartel, Watergate, The history of Bill and all his girls, Travelgate. Bernie you have plenty, more than any candidate to throw at the Dark Arkansas Princess. Stop warming her up, Bern her! The Republicans will.