Tag Archives: TPP


#3Novices #News #OnlineMedia #UnitedKingdom Source: 3Novices:Farage hails President Trump as being a man of his word for scrapping ‘EU’s’ TPP agreemet

via 3Novices:Farage hails President Trump as being a man of his word for scrapping ‘EU’s’ TPP agreemet — Brittius

WikiLeaks: Hillary Two-faced TPP – On Defense – Trump On Hillary Mock Catholics, Southerners, ‘needy Latinos’ — Reclaim Our Republic

– CLINTON CAMPAIGN ADMITS: HILLARY LACKS EMPATHY WITH EVERYDAY AMERICANS – REPORT: HACKER CLAIMS ‘RACIST HILLARY’ TAPE SET TO BE RELEASED WikiLeaks: Hillary’s Two-faced (Private v. Public) Policy on TPP Oct 12, 2016 by C. Mitchell Shaw In the second presidential debate between Clinton and Trump, aired live Sunday, Clinton was asked about some of […]

via WikiLeaks: Hillary Two-faced TPP – On Defense – Trump On Hillary Mock Catholics, Southerners, ‘needy Latinos’ — Reclaim Our Republic

Cables Show Hillary Clinton’s State Department Deeply Involved in Trans-Pacific Partnership

Cables Show Hillary Clinton’s State Department Deeply Involved in Trans-Pacific Partnership.

I initiated it, no I didn’t, now I did again……oh the TPP?  No, I had nothing to do with it.

Hillary Clinton doesn’t know what she has or has not done………she is oblivious to everything.


Secrecy from the government causes speculation and assumption, often inaccurate, often not, as what is perceived to be often is how it is seen.   A little honesty and transparency on behalf of our leaders would go a long way.   Transparency, a word often used but seldom practiced with government.

TPP: Unconstitutional tribunal for .01% oligarchs to dictate what is ‘fair trade’

Published: June 15, 2015 Share | Print This
From Blacklisted News

Note: Examiner.com has blocked public access to my articles on their site (and from other whistleblowers), so some links in my previous work are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive. I’ll update as “hobby time” allows; including my earliest work from 2009 to 2011 (blocked author pages: herehere). “The corporations have bribed the political leaders in every country to sign away their sovereignty and the general welfare of their people to private corporations. Corporations have paid US senators large sums for transferring Congress’ law-making powers to corporations.” – Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary to US Treasury, former editor of the Wall Street Journal Trans-Pacific-Partnership (TPP) is “secret national security legislation” that President Obama and both parties’ “leaderships” refuse to disclose to the American public, and only visible from WikiLeaks. President Obama attempted “fast track” dictatorial power for Congress to vote for TPP without access to full text or public consideration. “Fast track” violates the US Constitution’s requirement for the Senate to ratify all treaties with 2/3 vote by claiming that 50% is somehow the same (a tie is broken by the VP, so 50% is enough). President Clinton’s justification of “fast track” is here. TPP is Emperor’s New Clothes’ unconstitutional because it allows a foreign three-person tribunal chosen by the same .01% oligarch powers that created TPP to have power to tax Americans billions of our dollars for claimed “damages” of corporations. These three persons appointed by TPP interests would have dictatorial power to protect corporate claimed “future profits.” From Ellen Brown:

“To date, the highest ISDS award has been for $2.3 billion to Occidental Oil Company against the government of Ecuador over its termination of an oil-concession contract, this although the termination was apparently legal. Still in arbitration is a demand by Vattenfall, a Swedish utility that operates two nuclear plants in Germany, for compensation of €3.7 billion ($4.7 billion) under the ISDS clause of a treaty on energy investments, after the German government decided to shut down its nuclear power industry following the Fukushima disaster in Japan in 2011.”

President Obama led the lies of commission and omission for TPP: “If we don’t write the rules, China will.” Obama’s actions reminds of Bush Jr.’s Senior Advisor, Karl Rove’s admission:

“We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality – judiciously, as you will – we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out.”

Readers and writers in alternative media can explain, document, and prove that much of these “created realities” like TPP are “Big Lie” crimes, objectively not even close to the foundational principle of “limited government” within the US Constitution, and “created” with whatever bullshit rhetoric their focus groups conclude most likely to sell (thank you, Professor Frankfurt, for your bestseller making BS an academic term). Readers and writers in alternative media observe escalating US and developed nations’ “created reality” crimes in ~100 areas, but perhaps most easily recognized in:

Good news is that solutions are obvious; the challenge for Earth’s victory over these literalpsychopathic “leaders” is to cause critical mass of humanity to recognize “Emperor’s new clothes”obvious crimes, demand arrests, and split the ~95% of humanity who would choose love and justice from relatively few committed psychopathic wanna-be slave masters. Great news is that readers and writers in alternative media are certainly free to “study what the psychopaths do,” their crime du jour, AND we are also free to take the endgame path to:

  1. Declaring our study over; we’ve seen more than enough.
  2. Command the facts over a few key areas of the “Big Lie” crimes (feel free to take the three I have above).
  3. Confidently demand arrests and/or Truth & Reconciliation.

“The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny. . . . Were the power of judging joined with the legislative, the life and liberty of the subject would be exposed to arbitrary control, for the judge would then be the legislator.” – James Madison, Federalist Paper # 47 Note: I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History, with all economics factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences. I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.

Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History; also credentialed in Mathematics. He worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu

Share This Article…


Hillary Clinton isn’t saying much about anything just yet.   She is specifically staying away from the topic of “trade agreements”.   However, while Hillary was Secretary of State she referred to the Trans-Pacific Partnership, still being negotiated, as the “gold standard of free trade agreements”.

It must be a bit uncomfortable for Hillary to discuss a trade agreement with other nations and corporations, some from those same nations as a candidate for President of the United States.   It might have been more comfortable while she was Secretary of State, while accepting donations from some of those same corporations.

Hillary, whether she wants to answer to it or not, has an interest in the TPP on 3 levels:  1) As Secretary of State, 2) The Clinton Foundation and their acceptance of donations, 3) As a candidate for the presidency of the United States.  As Secretary of State, Hillary was all for the TPP, now as a candidate she isn’t committing yet.   Is she afraid it will further expose the Clinton Foundation’s acceptance of donations, and the influence it has on Hillary and her influence on the Trade Agreement?

Who has the most to gain from the TPP agreement; could it be the Clinton’s?   Has the TPP and the countries involved crossed the same path as the Clinton Foundation?   Yes they have!    Corporations who support the TPP have donated at least $21 million to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Secretary of State.   Coincidence?  Not likely.      Oh and by the way, Bill gets major bucks for his speeches from these same corporations.   The Clinton’s owe these nations and corporations a lot.  The Clinton’s have made huge profits, they’ve sold us out.

See the information below from The Washington Beacon


April 9, 2015 5:12 pm


“Companies who have signed on to the U.S. Business Coalition for TPP have donated a minimum of $21 million to the Clinton Foundation. The actual number is likely much higher than that because donations are disclosed in wide ranges. Major Clinton Foundation donors supporting the TPP include:

  • Coca Cola ($5,000,000—$10,000,000)
  • Wal-Mart ($2,000,000—$10,000,000)
  • Citigroup ($1,500,000—$6,000,000)
  • Dow Chemical ($1,025,000—$5,050,000)
  • Boeing ($1,000,000—$5,000,000)
  • Exxon Mobile ($1,000,000—$5,000,000)
  • Microsoft ($1,000,000—$5,000,000)
  • Procter & Gamble ($1,000,000—$5,000,000)
  • Pfizer ($1,000,000—$5,000,000)
  • Toyota ($1,000,000—$5,000,000)
  • General Electric ($500,000—$1,000,000)
  • Monsanto ($500,000—$1,000,000)
  • Nike ($500,000—$1,000,000)
  • Visa ($500,000—$1,000,000)
  • Morgan Stanley ($360,000—$775,000)
  • Goldman Sachs ($250,000—$500,000)

A number of foreign governments involved in the TPP negotiations have also donated money to the foundation:

  • Australia ($5,000,000—$10,000,000)
  • Brunei ($1,000,000—$5,000,000)
    • Canada ($250,000—$500,000 ”                                                                        UNQUOTE