Tag Archives: terrorists

man killed by antifa in denver………

Tell us Joe Biden that this man was killed by an idea and not a terrorist organization!!!

Dinesh d’Souza

To Joe Biden…….. just an idea!


Soleimani: General of Iran. Call him an official if you wish. But can you call him an official without also calling him a terrorist? No you can not. He used his “official” position to position himself up to the highest point of terrorism. He planned, implemented, ordered terrorist acts world wide.

Killing/assassinating Soleimani is being criticized mostly by the Democrats in the U.S. The only other geographical complaints are coming from Iran. So, Democrats are siding with the Iranians in ripping Trump for doing away with the world’s most dangerous terrorist. They (Dem’s) claim there was no “imminent” danger, so why take him out now? Soleimani gave no indication he was puting a halt to his terrorist orders. He wasn’t supposed to be out of Iran, he was in Iraq. He wasn’t on vacation. Iran had already stepped up aggressive assaults. A terrorist act was imminent, was likely and soon and in the least inevitable. If Trump had passed on this target and an attack against more Americans had taken place and it became known he passed on it……….the Dems would be screaming, why not? The point is, it doesn’t matter what Trump does he is going to be attacked by the Left.

What are the Democrats really pissy about? Possibly the fact that Trump DID what the previous administrations failed to do. The Democrats are afraid the 2020 entry into the White House will fade even further away. So, they attack Trump. They can not keep him from doing what he should do, is supposed to do, what the Constitution requires him to do, and what he got elected to do.

The Democrats would rather place 2020 before the country. What Trump did was in the best interests of the country. What Trump did was put the country first. The Democrats are thinking only of their seats and election 2020.

It is disgusting listening to the Democrats justify their unjustifiable position. The Squad in Congress are the most pathetic. There was a time they’d be considered traitors. They are!

The Democrats need to learn the meaning of imminent. Yes, had Soleimani been allowed to continue his path freely, terrorists acts would have been/were imminent!

Definition of Imminent:


likely to occur at any moment; impending:Her death is imminent.projecting or leaning forward; overhanging.




Image result for photo of Nancy Pelosi at the restaurant opening tonight
I pray for President Trump everyday! (usa.com)

Nancy Pelosi tonight: ” Closely monitoring the situation following bombings targeting U.S. troops in Iraq. We must ensure the safety of our service members, including ending needless provocations from the Administration and demanding that Iran cease its violence. America & world cannot afford war.”


Given Iran’s past demonstration of hitting targets with their missiles with greater accuracy than tonight; THEY DIDN’T REALLY WANT TO KILL ANY AMERICANS TONIGHT DID THEY? They knew how Trump would respond. Their media, controlled by their government, are claiming approx. 30 Americans were killed (there were none as of now). How would they have known that? They wouldn’t have. They knew their launches fell short, possibly deliberately. They had to save face on the inside and they had to give a kill number. They are as bogus as the media itself. Look for terrorists type attacks in the future. They’ll go back to business as usual. However, that too would be a mistake. We’ll know when the Iranian regime is behind attacks. They leave calling cards. They love to brag, to look mean and powerful. They’ll get the same response they feared tonight in the future.

Can you imagine how the last week or two would have played out if any of the 2020 Democratic candidates where President, or God forbid Hillary Clinton? #1 the now dead terrorist general of Iran would still be alive.


_________________________________________________________________________ The following paragraphs are from “They Must Be Stopped” by Brigitte Gabriel ” In November 2001- just a few short months after September 11 – a detailed document was found in a villa in Switzerland by Swiss authorities. This document outlined a hundred-year plan for radical Islam to infiltrate and dominate the West […]


ARLIN REPORT “THOUGHT” OF THE DAY: Muslims don’t snitch on Muslims

Generally speaking, Muslims do not snitch on Muslims.   They won’t tell on their neighbor when seen taking explosive or bomb making material into a garage or to the kitchen.  Most things thought of as suspicious will go unreported.   Not because they’re afraid of repercussions, the reason is deeper than that.

While most Muslims are not terrorists or violent; they do understand there are many that share their religion, even family members, friends and neighbors that are.   Those that have a deep religious extremity of their beliefs (radical) and killing all that are infidels (non-Islamic) is part of their life goals.    Their mission is a world dominated by Islam, nothing but Islam.   If you are not Muslim, you have no right to life.   They will conquer their mission, their goal doing whatever it takes, for as long as it takes; no matter how violent, all in the name of Allah!

So, why don’t Muslims snitch on Muslims; even those that don’t agree with the violence?   While they do not agree with the means, “peaceful” Muslims respect radical extremists Muslims (terrorists), for their passion and commitment to the “religion”.   They believe it is their right to be radical, to kill non-Muslims, to achieve the goals of world dominance according to their Koran.

Now you understand why Barack Obama would never say “radical extremists Muslims or terrorists”.   He has respect for their passion and commitment.   He said, to paraphrase “I will always stand on the side of Islam/Muslim world”.

Guest comment: Hannity interview explains why refugee flow so dangerous to us — Refugee Resettlement Watch

Editor: From time to time I post guest columns from readers. Although a few days late, this is a very welcome piece. I heard the interview live driving through South Dakota the other day and thought—you must all hear this! Thanks to reader Julia for being on the same wavelength and sending me her comments. […]

via Guest comment: Hannity interview explains why refugee flow so dangerous to us — Refugee Resettlement Watch

This article is a must read!   Wake up!


This is how terrorists filter in a nation.

These MEN, just leaving their families behind? Those that would have the greatest need to relocate to safety would be women, children and elderly.   Don’t continue to be so naive!  These are not refugees.   These MEN; most will create social issues of disruption, protesters, violent protests on demands not requests, others will bomb the population, murder and rape. Its their history. Look at Europe.   The creation of warfare terrorism.

Look at the people on the far right of the barrier. What do you see?  I see people with concern they are being INVADED.