Claire McCaskill is in a fight for her Senate seat, a liberal, far left seat (Democrat, as if I need to remind you). Claire’s campaign ads are designed to convince Missouri voters that she is a “moderate” (an in the middle, independent thinker). That could not be further from the truth. Claire McCaskill is a Hillary/Obama follower, one of their lost puppies. Undercover videos now show Claire’s own staff saying “…….people can’t know that.”, on Claire’s position on gun control, telling voters one thing but supporting the opposite; she is far to the left on gun control. Claire is not in the middle, not a moderate.
Claire McCaskill is a far left, liberal as it gets Democrat. A vote for Claire is a vote for Chuck Schumer. Yes Schumer and McCaskill, the do anything it takes to keep Brett Kavanaugh from be confirmed to the Supreme Court fake moderates!
O’Keefed! Sen. Claire McCaskill BUSTED over views on guns, immigration —
Originally posted on Refugee Resettlement Watch: According to AP at ABC News, here, they have likely already decided and an announcement will come next week. ? Which way will they go? ? There are two major issues at stake (maybe more than two, but two for me!). The first is whether the President has the…
via Supreme Court could announce fate of Trump ‘travel ban’ and refugee ceiling reduction at any time — Brittius
From Stilton Jarlsberg: History was made yesterday when, for the first time since our nation became a nation, Democrats filibustered an exemplary Supreme Court Nominee because – and we’ve got plenty of political scientists and analysts to back us up on this – they’re complete and total assholes. The only way around this epic act…
via Enjoying A Little Nukie — hocuspocus13
Hillary Clinton The Movie “Banned” by the Courts in 2008 The U.S. Supreme Court said it wants a case involving federal election law and an attack “documentary” on Hillary Clinton reheard next September. The justices said new “argument” should address two key Supreme Court precedents upholding “federal election law” and whether the high court should […]
via Hillary, the Movie — Andelino’s Weblo
When truth is written on anything by anyone at anytime it should not be banned. It should not matter if it is during or prior to an election. The truth should always be allowed to be spoken and heard; NEVER BANNED. “What difference does it make”; whether it is a union, organized labor, special interests group…….The truth is so rare today, when spoken is an asset. If on the other hand the message, the movie or writing is found to be false, appropriate punishment and banishment is the law.
Banishment of truth should not be allowed to protect guilt! There should be no escape for the guilty.
The media, once again taking it upon itself to twist every opportunity it can into a political correctness and racial issue. 94.5 Dallas and 97.5 The Beat, to name just a couple are bringing out the race card against Trump once again. Trump’s “possible” selections for the Supreme Court did not include an African-American. Oh the sin of it all!! It is not a requirement to include a specific race, religion or even gender in a list for “POSSIBLE” candidates for THE COURT.
Could Trump have included a black man or woman to satisfy the MEDIA or the LEFT? Yes, just make a token candidate for THE COURT. The media should know as well as anyone, Trump will not be politically correct for the sake of satisfying or shutting people up.
What is wrong with making a list, checking it twice with simply the best conservative choices out there regardless of skin tone or gender. Then again, that explains the media’s twist and fabricated issue; they aren’t conservative; so no matter what Trump came up with, they would contradict. The liberal media!!! Opportunistic media!
Trump will not, nor should he cave into the will of the Media.
> A lot of people have brought up the fact that they won’t vote for
> Trump if he’s the eventual nominee. I just want to put something in
> Justice Scalia’s seat is vacant. Ginsberg is 82 years old, Kennedy is
> 79, Breyer is 77, and Thomas is 67.
> Nowadays, the data shows that the average age of a Supreme Court
> retirement or death occurs after 75. These are 5 vacancies that will
> likely come up over the next 4-8 years.
> The next President will have the power to potentially create a 7-2
> Supreme Court skewed in their ideology.
> Think about that… 7-2. If the next President appoints 5 young
> justices, it will guarantee control of the Supreme Court for an entire
> generation. And 7-2 decisions will hold up much more over time than
> 5-4 decisions which are seemed to be lacking in mandate.
> Hillary has made it clear she will use the Supreme Court to go after
> the 2nd Amendment. She has literally said that the Supreme Court was
> wrong in its Heller decision stating that the Court should overturn
> and remove the individual right to keep and bear arms. Period.
> Everyone saying that they won’t vote for one candidate or the other if
> they are the GOP nominee, please realize this: If Hillary Clinton wins
> and gets to make these appointments, you likely will never see another
> Conservative victory at the Supreme Court level for the rest of your
> life. Ever.
> If you are a Conservative, a vote for anyone BUT the GOP nominee,
> whomever that will be (or a vote for no one), is a vote for Hillary
This morning on my Arlin Report Thought of the Day post, I mentioned Antonin Scalia’s death was another mystery. While it still may be a mystery as to the exact cause, it should be stated the Supreme Court jurist was having health issues, heart problems being one.
I have learned of Scalia’s health from a fellow blogger, I have much respect for that was good enough to inform me, as well as others stating the same.
That being said, with a government and the height of corruption in this nation it is easy to be suspicious and certainly question everything. It appears most likely that Scalia died from a health issue/natural causes, hopefully he passed peacefully.