The video is nearly 2 hours long, and chances are you’ll not even open the link. If we allow this to go unchallenged as the corrupt State Houses, courts and our Supreme Court have chosen to ignore, then voting will no longer ever be fair; and your voice taken away. Yes ignore! The new way of saying there is no evidence/no proof is to ignore it. Saying it is not there even when it is presented to you under your nose, is the new (hell maybe its business as usual) way of saying “there is no proof, just move on”.
Whether you voted for Trump, or voted for Biden but you still want an honest election, then you absolutely need to take the time to watch this video link. You’ll spend over 3 hours watching the Super Bowl! What is that going to do for your future, your kids future? Watch it soon, it’ll probably be taken down before long; Big Tech and CONGRESS don’t want you to see it. SEE WHAT THEY REFUSED TO SEE!
Originally posted on Dr. Robert Owens Chronicles the History of the Future: The Supreme Court refused to accept the Texas case. In effect, ruling that accusations brought by multiple states of clear violations of the Constitution in the theft of an election are not worth their time to review. Justice Samuel Alito issued a statement with the dismissal…
When RBG fell asleep at the State of the Union address, it really was no big deal. How many listen anyway?
The argument has begun on who should nominate Ginsburg’s replacement to the Supreme Court.
Here is the skinny on that: It does not make any difference who is in the White House, a Democrat or a Republican………..each party is going to fight to gain the “chance/right” to make that selection. Democrats will argue that the nomination should be delayed, so if a miracle happens and they win the election…….they can nominate the Justice. They’ll even say it was Ginsburg’s dying wish not to let Trump nominate her replacement…..and maybe it was; but, it is still the sitting president’s decision to make.
The Democrats are cringing to think Trump will name another Supreme Court Justice. They will do anything/say anything not to let that happen. If the roles were reversed the Republican’s would do the same. EVERYBODY wants to change the rules when their party is not in the Oval Office.
It is Trump’s decision to make and the Democrats, not Nancy Pelosi, not Joe Biden, not Chuck Schumer, not even Adam Schiff or Alexandria Ocasio Cortez can do a damn thing about it. Oh, crazy Chuck can vote no when it is put to a vote……..but that is all folks. They will pull every dirty trick in the book to delay. We’ll hear of new scandals, mark my words.
Ask yourself: If Hillary had been elected president what do you think she would do? YOU KNOW WHAT SHE WOULD DO!
We can not allow this to happen. It would only get swampier. I don’t think Biden will get elected to begin with. However, shouldn’t Republicans have an “INSURANCE PLAN”? Isn’t that how it works? (comment by The ArlinReport)
Barack Obama himself reportedly remains downbeat about Joe Biden’s 2020 election bid, claiming that the former US Vice President lacks an “intimate bond” with electorate. Democratic presidential hopeful and former Vice President Joe Biden has again suggested that the Obamas would be given important jobs in his administration should he win the 2020 Presidential election. […]
Claire McCaskill is in a fight for her Senate seat, a liberal, far left seat (Democrat, as if I need to remind you). Claire’s campaign ads are designed to convince Missouri voters that she is a “moderate” (an in the middle, independent thinker). That could not be further from the truth. Claire McCaskill is a Hillary/Obama follower, one of their lost puppies. Undercover videos now show Claire’s own staff saying “…….people can’t know that.”, on Claire’s position on gun control, telling voters one thing but supporting the opposite; she is far to the left on gun control. Claire is not in the middle, not a moderate.
Claire McCaskill is a far left, liberal as it gets Democrat. A vote for Claire is a vote for Chuck Schumer. Yes Schumer and McCaskill, the do anything it takes to keep Brett Kavanaugh from be confirmed to the Supreme Court fake moderates!
Originally posted on Refugee Resettlement Watch: According to AP at ABC News, here, they have likely already decided and an announcement will come next week. ? Which way will they go? ? There are two major issues at stake (maybe more than two, but two for me!). The first is whether the President has the…
From Stilton Jarlsberg: History was made yesterday when, for the first time since our nation became a nation, Democrats filibustered an exemplary Supreme Court Nominee because – and we’ve got plenty of political scientists and analysts to back us up on this – they’re complete and total assholes. The only way around this epic act…
Hillary Clinton The Movie “Banned” by the Courts in 2008 The U.S. Supreme Court said it wants a case involving federal election law and an attack “documentary” on Hillary Clinton reheard next September. The justices said new “argument” should address two key Supreme Court precedents upholding “federal election law” and whether the high court should […]
When truth is written on anything by anyone at anytime it should not be banned. It should not matter if it is during or prior to an election. The truth should always be allowed to be spoken and heard; NEVER BANNED. “What difference does it make”; whether it is a union, organized labor, special interests group…….The truth is so rare today, when spoken is an asset. If on the other hand the message, the movie or writing is found to be false, appropriate punishment and banishment is the law.
Banishment of truth should not be allowed to protect guilt! There should be no escape for the guilty.
The media, once again taking it upon itself to twist every opportunity it can into a political correctness and racial issue. 94.5 Dallas and 97.5 The Beat, to name just a couple are bringing out the race card against Trump once again. Trump’s “possible” selections for the Supreme Court did not include an African-American. Oh the sin of it all!! It is not a requirement to include a specific race, religion or even gender in a list for “POSSIBLE” candidates for THE COURT.
Could Trump have included a black man or woman to satisfy the MEDIA or the LEFT? Yes, just make a token candidate for THE COURT. The media should know as well as anyone, Trump will not be politically correct for the sake of satisfying or shutting people up.
What is wrong with making a list, checking it twice with simply the best conservative choices out there regardless of skin tone or gender. Then again, that explains the media’s twist and fabricated issue; they aren’t conservative; so no matter what Trump came up with, they would contradict. The liberal media!!! Opportunistic media!
Trump will not, nor should he cave into the will of the Media.