Tag Archives: Pelosi


Pelosi is still busy tearing the speech – now she is chewing them up. Mr. President: In copying this page – instead of this page this person substituted a vulgar photo which shouldn’t even be on the internet. This is a good example on how Google terrorists interfere with every blog that we write. The […]


pelosi's foot-in-mouth disease

On the impeachment of President Trump, Nancy Pelosi said, “it’s not a question of proof, it’s a question of allegations!”

Oh really?” @JudgeJeanine

Democrat’s strategy to convict: Trump must prove his innocence.

In a real court of law the accused must be PROVEN guilty by the prosecution. Hopefully one side of the political isle will get this right. We know the Democratic (Socialists) side will not along with a handful of Trump hating Republicans. We know Mitt (nitwit) Romney is so jealous of Trump’s victory in a presidential election……he is everything anti-Trump. He can’t stand it that Trump out-performs old political hang around antiques.

Pathetic injustice. If they’d do this to a president they’d do it to any of us. Just expose them for what they are.

arlin report thought(s) of the day: fair impeachment trial scream the dems!

Image result for photos of pelosi, nadler and schiff together
Bangordailynews.com The Senate must give us a fair trail. We want more witnesses.

Here is the irony of all this impeachment hullabaloo. The Democrats constantly on a daily basis scream for a fair impeachment trial from the Senate. Why are they so concerned they won’t get a fair trial? Because their House Party, the House impeachment inquiry/hearing was anything but fair. The biggest screamers are the biggest players: House Speaker Pelosi, Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler.

When you are crooked, you have little trust in anyone, because you are afraid of being treated or dealt with in the same manner you have acted. A dirty heart leaks with paranoia.

Cheaters want everyone to play by the rules, except the rules don’t apply to them.

OP-ED: Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi join effort to take President Trump down in 2020 — WEATHER INTERNAL

One who thinks he is still relevant and all powerful, and the other, she thinks she is America’s supreme leader. Both delusional! What planet do they live on? Democrats can’t deliver, yet we’d be better off with them in TOTAL CONTROL? LOL! (by Arlin Report)

DML News: News you can trust. The post OP-ED: Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi join effort to take President Trump down in 2020 appeared first on DML News.

OP-ED: Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi join effort to take President Trump down in 2020 — WEATHER INTERNAL

Friday News : Pelosi and Fair Trial — T&R Independent Books/Writing Services

That question is in relation to her new demand that the Senate get her approval before she’ll send the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate. Now, President Trump responded by demanding a speedy trial. And that is his right. But the Senate is not under any obligation to seek the House’s approval.

Friday News : Pelosi and Fair Trial — T&R Independent Books/Writing Services

An excellent example of common sense expressed. Just someone telling it like it is. Good read on link above.

usmca trade agreement: Another victory for trump

Yes a victory despite of the Democrats.

The Democrats could not make an announcement that Mexico, Canada and the United States have agreed on some changes to the USMCA Trade Agreement (they’ll sign agreement today) with out taking political jabs at Trump. The Democrats HAD to point out that Trump’s administration presented a flawed USMCA agreement to them and it WAS the Democrats who perfected the agreement they now have. Basically the Democrats are taking full credit for the USMCA Trade Agreement.

Lets make something clear here. It was Donald Trump who initiated this trade agreement with Mexico and Canada, replacing a horrible agreement called NAFTA (from the Clinton administration) in the first place. At the time Democrats heavily criticized Trump for negotiating a new trade agreement with Mexico and Canada. Now they want everyone to know or believe that it was the Democrats that improved this flawed trade proposal from Trump, that the Democrats made it better. Of course they want us to believe it is better now because they held it on the shelf for nearly a year “perfecting” it. It will be voted on next week.

It would have been “BETTER” for all 3 countries if this agreement had been acted upon months ago. Interestingly, Pelosi makes the announcement that they have an agreement on USMCA an hour after they announced two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump. The articles: 1) abuse of power 2) obstruction of Congress. No article on “bribery”? Were these two announcements stacked one after the other minutes apart to show Americans that the Democrats can walk and chew gum. No, no politics here!

from Wikipedia:

The Agreement between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada[1] is a signed but not ratified free trade agreement between CanadaMexico, and the United States.

The Agreement is the result of a 2017–2018 renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) by its member states, which informally agreed to the terms on September 30, 2018, and formally on October 1.[2] The USMCA was signed by United States President Donald Trump, Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on November 30, 2018 as a side event of the 2018 G20 Summit in Buenos Aires. Each country’s legislature still must ratify the agreement.

Negotiations “focused largely on auto exports, steel and aluminum tariffs, and the dairy, egg, and poultry markets. One provision “prevents any party from passing laws that restrict the cross-border flow of data”.[3] Compared to NAFTA, USMCA increases environmental and labour regulations, and incentivizes more domestic production of cars and trucks.[4] The agreement also provides updated intellectual property protections, gives the United States more access to Canada’s dairy market, imposes a quota for Canadian and Mexican automotive production, and increases the duty free limit for Canadians who buy U.S. goods online from $20 to $150.[5]

arlin report thought of the day: presumed to be the case……….ah but!

It must be nice, if you’ve been called as a witness by Adam Schiff several days ago, and upon Schiff releasing the transcript of the hearing the witness can say ‘oh wait hold on I just remembered something, I presume Trump had a quid pro quo…….or Trump did this, but I presume it happened’. So now the Democratic Socialist are wetting their pants with excitement that now they have something. IDIOTS, presumed means something may have happened because there is a possibility or even probability something you claim to have happen “may” have happened. Let’s even say probably happened. That isn’t proof. Presumed is very similar if not synonymous to assumed. There is a gap here though presumed/assumed leaves doubt. You must prove something to be true with out a reasonable doubt to be convicted of a charge. That is how its supposed to work though and that is not a presumption or an assumption.

Rep. Eric Swalwell-CA, accused Trump of extortion on Fox News this evening, because of the above mentioned presumption. Why is it all of these representatives and senators from California are the biggest whiners and idiots. I mean, Schiff, Pelosi, Feinstein, Kamala Harris, and Maxine Waters…………wow what a crew!