Tag Archives: Democrats




There are high school students, possibly grade school students that could explain the difference between democrats and socialists.   Fact is, if the DNC chairperson can not explain the difference, didn’t she just say “There is no difference.”    And as Hillary R. Clinton would say “What difference does it make?”





It is rather ironic and comical when liberal Democrats criticize what they often refer to as the “Republican Clown Car”.    They are apparently totally blind to what they have riding in their van named Scooby.


Aside from the Socialist hiding behind the Democratic Party currently residing in our White House, who is the face of the Democrats?

Many Democrats still claim Hillary is their gal.   However, that support is obviously dwindling, with the email scandal, Republican Bonanza!   Hillary can not shovel her past into a deep hole and bury it as she has before, and the recent past will remain in the present.   The future does not look promising, Hillary issues will not disappear as long as she is a candidate for president or dog catcher.   When you beat the same old drum over and over, the skin will eventually wear out.  Hillary, your party is wearing out, fast.

I doubt Hillary will go away on her own, even with party prodding; after all, she said it is her time and she is entitled to the presidency.  Another Democratic face will need to step in.   The best bet would probably be Elizabeth Warren, if she can be convinced.

I will state right here and now, if I have to; most of you who have read my blogs know I am nowhere close to that side of the political scale; for any democrat, none visible anyway!

If the Democratic Party is to survive, and they probably will, they need a face.   Fresh didn’t work with Obama and the old farts left don’t show much promise either.    Is there a national search party active to find new blood?

Of course the Illuminati and CFR may help them out.   Ahh……the Illuminati, they could represent both the Democratic and Republican parties.  Don’t worry, I don’t have the energy this morning to dip into that.

The Republicans on the other hand are searching for party face as well.   They have a different issue, everyone wants to be that gal or guy!   They’ll go through the selection process, as nobody has really stepped it up.   Not convinced their ID belongs to Jeb.

Much to be answered in the coming months.   Who will survive.

Here is a tip for the Democrats, take it or leave it and they will probably leave it (they don’t ask me):   Buy Hillary a nice little place in an isolated place in Alaska, without a telephone or email and stay there.   Learn to fish and hunt Hillary, maybe Sarah will come and visit over a cup of coffee.










Independent voters never really have had a strong party structure, since they never wanted to be associated with Democrats or Republicans.  They have always stayed away from being labeled a party, intentionally or not, which allowed them to vote for anyone they wished.  Independents did not have to vote for a particular “independent” backed candidate.   It is difficult to win an election when everyone goes off in their own direction.   However, isn’t that what being an independent is all about, “do what you wanna do”?

If independents band together somehow as in a convention and choose a candidate, are they no longer independents?   I suppose you can call your group (party….ugh) by any name you wish.   This is my opinion, I don’t believe the Tea Party was/is an independent party/group/organization.   They are Republicans for the most part, that have been labeled extremist nuts and a few other names.  There are many issues I agree with the Teas on, they may want to be a bit more careful as to who their mouth pieces are and how they convey their message.

Now may be the best time in a long time for a third-party.   We the People seem to have a strong disliking for Dems and Reps,  (which made me think of them as dim-wits and repeaters, same old stupid crap).    Why not a party of not just for “We the People”, maybe call it “The Peoples Party”.   This should be a party of people across America who are independent “THINKERS“.   They/we should call it by whatever name the party deems appropriate and chooses.

I love using Blacklisted News as a source along with Breitbart.  They encourage we share their articles.    They go against the mainstream media and report what we should know.  Below is one such article that inspired the one above hopefully you just read.   Oh and please share.


Published: January 9, 2015


The number of Americans who identify themselves as independent of the dominant US political parties has hit an average of 43 percent, marking a new high in Gallup polling since 1988.The 43 percent of voters who claim they are political independents, before taking into account those who lean toward either the Democratic or Republican Party, has risen steadily since 2008 – the year in which identification with the Democratic Party hit a 25-year high, at 36 percent, amid the end of Republican George W. Bush’s second term in office.

Since 2011, the number of self-identified political independents has hovered above 40 percent, with each year in that time period marking a new high since 1999, when independents numbered 39 percent of poll respondents.

Overall, 30 percent of respondents identify as Democrats, a number down slightly from recent years. This number also represents what Gallup reported as possibly the lowest figure for Democrats since the 1950s.

“Although the party identification data compiled in telephone polls since 1988 are not directly comparable to the in-person polling Gallup collected before then, the percentages identifying as Democrats prior to 1988 were so high that it is safe to say the average 30% identifying as Democrats last year is the lowest since at least the 1950s,” wrote Gallup’s Jeffrey M. Jones.

Twenty-six percent of all respondents identify as Republicans, up one percentage point from 2013 – the year that the number of Republicans hit a new low since Ronald Reagan’s first term in office in the early 1980s.

The low party identification numbers, Gallup posited, are likely related to widespread disgust with partisan gridlock in Washington and longstanding discontent with actions taken by both political parties, Congress, and the White House.

The new Gallup poll also surveyed whether independents “leaned” toward a major party.

“An average of 17% of Americans who initially identified as independents subsequently said they ‘leaned’ Republican, 15% were independents who leaned Democratic, with the remaining 11% not expressing a leaning to either party,” according to Gallup.

All in all, the poll found that 45 percent of the total respondents associate with or call themselves part of the Democratic Party, while 42 percent call themselves Republicans or are Republican-leaning independents.

“That the three-point Democratic edge was down from six points in 2013, and among Democrats’ smaller advantages the past 25 years,” Gallup added.

“The only year Republicans held a notable edge since Gallup began tracking independents’ political leanings was in 1991, the year Republican President George H.W. Bush’s approval ratings soared after the United States’ victory in the Persian Gulf War,” Gallup noted.

So, while self-identified political independence has hit a new high, many of those who claim no strict allegiance to either major party will end up voting for major party candidates.

“What we have here isn’t so much a rise in political independence as much as a rise in the desire to be labeled ‘independent,’” wrote the Washington Post. “Indeed, almost every indicator shows that the American people are actually becoming more polarized, more electorally predictable, and less swing-y — i.e. less independent.”

Furthermore, third-party candidates receive little support in US presidential or congressional elections.

Gallup reported that “given historical trends, 2015 could bring a new record” for self-identified political independents in the US, “as the percentage identifying as independents typically increases in the year before a presidential election, averaging a 2.5-point increase in the last six such years.”

Gallup’s latest results are based on aggregated data from 15 separate telephone polls conducted in 2014.