Tag Archives: Adam Schiff

arlin report thought(s) of the day: fair impeachment trial scream the dems!


Image result for photos of pelosi, nadler and schiff together
Bangordailynews.com The Senate must give us a fair trail. We want more witnesses.

Here is the irony of all this impeachment hullabaloo. The Democrats constantly on a daily basis scream for a fair impeachment trial from the Senate. Why are they so concerned they won’t get a fair trial? Because their House Party, the House impeachment inquiry/hearing was anything but fair. The biggest screamers are the biggest players: House Speaker Pelosi, Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler.

When you are crooked, you have little trust in anyone, because you are afraid of being treated or dealt with in the same manner you have acted. A dirty heart leaks with paranoia.

Cheaters want everyone to play by the rules, except the rules don’t apply to them.

KOMMONSENTSJANE – House Dems Implementing New Investigations Into President’s Strike On Terrorist Soleimani – As Evidence Shows Democrats Violating Constitutional Laws And Endangering US National Security — kommonsentsjane


Originally posted on Evans News Report: By: Brian Evans On Monday, House Intel Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) announced that the House Democrats are calling for new Congressional hearings into President Trump, only this time, it is into his authorization of a drone strike that killed the Qassem Soleimani, who was the top Iran commander and known…

KOMMONSENTSJANE – House Dems Implementing New Investigations Into President’s Strike On Terrorist Soleimani – As Evidence Shows Democrats Violating Constitutional Laws And Endangering US National Security — kommonsentsjane

KOMMONSENTSJANE – DEMOCRATS REMOVE; SO HELP ME GOD – POOF – GOD IS GONE. — kommonsentsjane


They think by doing this it releases them from any guilt. Of course you have to have a conscience to have any guilt, but I guess they think they do. It takes away credibility, they don’t have to play by any rules of order. Though they suggest they do. Which means lying is acceptable. We’ve seen that from Adam Schiff and Nadler both. (by Arlin Report/Arlin Luttrell) May Gob Bless America and guide us through a new year!

Who is Nadler without the vote of the people to make this decision? Does he think he is God? Who does he think he is – he has no authority to make this move. No more God in the People’s House. Democrats have removed it from”swearing in” – in front of the House Democrats/Republicans. The […]

KOMMONSENTSJANE – DEMOCRATS REMOVE; SO HELP ME GOD – POOF – GOD IS GONE. — kommonsentsjane

The Liberal Media Is Covering This Up!… HUGE DEMOCRAT MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR CAMPAIGN DONA TIONS SCANDAL BROKEN UP! — U.S. Constitutional Free Press


Hillary and OMG say it isn’t so……..Adam Schiff received his own personal foreign money (okay campaign donation)? LOL!

Originally posted on a12iggymom’s Blog: On Friday The Gateway Pundit reported on the news that Democrat operative and Robert Mueller chief witness George Nader was indicted for his involvement in illegal campaign contributions from foreign entities to the Hillary campaign in 2016 Nader was one of Mueller’s top witnesses and he is a…

The Liberal Media Is Covering This Up!… HUGE DEMOCRAT MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR CAMPAIGN DONA TIONS SCANDAL BROKEN UP! — U.S. Constitutional Free Press

liberal professors lecturing we the people because?


Because the Left, the Democrats on this Judiciary Committee’s act II of impeachment believe We the People are too stupid to understand the Constitution. Therefore, the impeachment process must be explained to us. Not DUE PROCESS mind you, but the Left’s process.

Keep in mind today, the four “witnesses” are extreme (extremely liberal) Left Law professors. Which means we will get “their” interpretations and opinions, which also follows a path of their “political” ideals. They will and as we speak are giving us more than a lecture on the constitution. Three are stating they what they want us to believe as factual. That isn’t what they should be doing, but it is what Chairman Nadler hoped for. They are there solely for the purpose of convincing us that Trump is guilty and should be impeached. The problem is a fair process, due process has not been followed. Guess what folks, what they these liberal professors aren’t telling you is that it is unconstitutional to hold an impeachment hearing ‘WITHOUT DUE PROCESS’. These hearings handed off from corrupt Adam Schiff to Jerrod Nadler continue to be a railroad job to impeachment and is one of the greatest scandals in the history of our nation.

You do not get any more liberal than university professors. They are tainting students with their leftist ideas, ideals and policies they wish. They are part of the problem. They lecture us on the constitution, but what they really want to do is throw it out the window and re-write it, or abolish it. What we are hearing today is propaganda from the extreme left. These law professors are as far left as you would think it can get. The gauge still moves.

What a hoax. What a scam. While this crap is allowed to continue, a trade act between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico sits on Nancy Pelosi’s filthy desk. The creation of thousands of jobs are being held up by Pelosi because she is more focused on getting rid of Trump. Key phrase “jobs are being held up”. We are having impeachment hearings, while nothing gets done, jobs are held up, yet they are impeaching because Trump held up foreign aid to the Ukraine. Congress has put a foreign nation and an impeachment hoax before the American, Canadian and Mexican people. Jobs and welfare of our people can wait, so the Democrats can remove Trump from the White House and won’t be around for re-election. Lets make it clear right here. In Nov. of 2020 Donald Trump will be on the ballot for the presidency.

Nadler is hoping we accept these political law professors testimony to justify their impeachment decision. They hope we are convinced the Dems are doing the right thing. They don’t explain the holes. These professors can only state what the constitution says, however, that is based on how they wish to also interpret. These liberal law professors do not particularly believe in the constitution, especially in it entirety. They as I said, would love to amend the entire document.

They want us to believe and accept the “opinions” of these professors and that they are sacred, because they believe they are!

One last point: It doesn’t get anymore liberal than Prof. Pamela S. Karlan from Stanford University, a Trump hater.

censuring trump


A couple of House Reps are backing away from impeaching Trump. As one states “It has no value at this time”. Think about that “no value”. No value to the Democrats? It wouldn’t have value….. it is a bad mark , its about shaming and then a move to remove in the Senate (a trial). It is a devaluation process. The Democrats entire purpose of this impeachment sham is for their own gain. They believe, and arguably so that it is their best/only chance of defeating Trump in 2020. One of their own pretty much admits that with “It has no value at this time”. She sees writing on the wall, that Americans do not want impeachment. It has been a waste of time and massive dollars, while nothing gets done (a do nothing Congress).

So now they want to publicly slap Trump on the wrist. Censure! Okay, that literally means nothing. It is a reprimand. It is a declaration, a formal statement of we don’t like this guy, we don’t like what he has done. Schiff would probably be the author of such a statement. LOL! We already heard it, in the hearings, the pressers………even while on Thanksgiving leave. The Democrats have been informally (and at least once formally) been censuring Trump since day one! They didn’t like his tweets…..remember! Guess what, they still don’t. Some Democrats probably have no idea what censuring the President even means. I am sure they believe it would be an order to “shut him up and take away his powers”. They are that stupid. See the link below.

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45087.pdf

Congress has no disciplinary authority over the President except through impeachment. Thus, presidential censure resolutions express the “sense of” the House and/or Senate without additional legal implications.6

Warren told pro-school-choice activist she sent her kids to public school, campaign says otherwise — WEATHER INTERNAL


Elizabeth Warren and Adam Schiff have a lot in common. Both are habitual liars.

On Thursday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., told a school choice activist in Georgia that she had sent both her children to public school. On Friday, her campaign told The Washington Free Beacon differently.

Warren told pro-school-choice activist she sent her kids to public school, campaign says otherwise — WEATHER INTERNAL