I agree we don’t need another dynasty, Bush or Clinton; but what we want isn’t always what we get. The blog mentions we had dynasties with the Roosevelts and the Kennedys. I don’t know that much about the Roosevelt dynasty, other than they had their historically unfavorable events as did the Kennedys. The Kennedys didn’t really impress all that much except JFK was popular. Time has proven his character wasn’t that favorable in what we want in a President. He certainly had his failures. Teddy…..will it was Teddy, name, family fame and money got him a life of politics. We know his history! The point is enough is enough. Hillary has no achievements in politics, just ask her, she’ll answer “will I have a lot of miles”. Hillary couldn’t write her own resume. You want to mention Benghazi? WILL I DO, SHE HAS BLOOD ON HER HANDS, WITH BUDDY OBAMA. We don’t need further Clinton fiasco events in the White House again! Why would we want to subject ourselves to more world wide embarrassment?
By Tom Quiner
I like Jeb Bush and I don’t like Hillary Clinton.
In the case of Mr. Bush, he seems like a man of integrity. I agree with him on most key political issues, but the ones on which I don’t agree concern me.
In the case of Ms. Clinton, she has not presented herself as a woman of integrity. I disagree with her on almost every single political issue of note.
In new polling, Mr. Bush as emerged as the frontrunner among Republican voters with 23% preferring him over Christ Christie (13%) and Dr. Ben Carson (7%).
As for Ms. Clinton, the latest polling shows that 82% of Democrats could see themselves voting for her. However, her negatives are high. Some 48% of all voters said they can’t see themselves voting for her.
Things can change. We have a long ways to go. But Ms. Clinton has a real problem…
View original post 135 more words