Sputnik: Clinton: Independent Palestinian State Essential for Peace Resolution ? ? ?Orwell — again . . . sigh . . . ~J

I find it a bit Gruber like, that Hillary Clinton speaks on foreign affairs when she was a total failure as Secretary of State.

2012: What's the 'real' truth?


© REUTERS/ Brendan McDermid
18:58 06.12.2014(updated 19:26 06.12.2014)

The US should not give up support for the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, says Hillary Clinton, praising the two-state model for the region. Meanwhile 34 percent of Americans want the White House to push for a one-state solution with equal rights for Israelis and Palestinians.

“I believe there is a necessary imperative to continue to try to achieve a resolution between Israel and the Palestinians,” Hillary Clinton said at a Brookings Institution forum on US-Israeli relations, as cited by the Washington Post.

The potential presidential candidate stressed that she considered the “two-state solution” an “essential concept” of peace negotiations, referring to the fact that the United States traditionally supported the idea of creating an independent Palestinian state.

“I am well aware of everything that is going on,” Hillary Clinton underscored, meaning the Israeli settlements policy, Palestinian unrest and the US failure in brokering peace negotiations this year.

Internet giant Google will play a significant part in the US presidential elections of 2016, when it will support Hillary Clinton, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said Thursday.


Google to Support…

View original post 228 more words


Can the House block Obama’s Executive Action on Immigration?

The question is, will the House even try?


The Republicans in Congress are trying to block President Obama’s series of executive actions on immigration, which is intended to protect up to 5 million immigrants who are living illegally in the country from deportation.

Last Thursday, the House of Representatives voted 219 to 197 to nullify the action. House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said “We’re looking at a variety of options, both for right now and when Republicans control both houses of the Congress next year,” but admits that “we have limited options and limited abilities to deal with it directly.”

Many say that the House of Representatives’ vote was largely a symbolic move intended to give Republicans an opportunity to vent. The White House has said it will veto any legislation that would undo the president’s move on immigration.

Source: Alan Rappeport, New York Times, “House Votes to Block Obama Action on Immigration”, 12/4/2014; Erin Kelly…

View original post 14 more words

LBJ (Conspirator) AND JFK…..



I have come across a new book; The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ by Roger Stone.    Normally, I would not mention or recommend a book until I have finished reading, then only if I find it a good read.  After reading the introduction, just starting chapter one, I can tell it’s one I will have trouble putting down.  I learned things about LBJ and a few others, surprisingly Nixon; yes RN himself.

On my Nook, the book is 444 pages, so it will take a few days to read; that’s why I thought I would present my discovery to you now, if you didn’t already know.

The JFK assassination has had many theories, tales and a lot of speculation since November 22, 1963 on conspiracies vs. the Lee Harvey Oswald lone assassin.   Personally, and I have friends, including blogger friends who do/will not agree with me; I am convinced more than one individual was involved in Kennedy’s assassination.

In 1968, Roger Stone  mentioned to former Attorney John Mitchell that he might someday write a book on the controversy surrounding JFK’s assassination.   Mitchell suggested that Stone wait until the 50th anniversary.  Roger Stone agreed.

In 1972, I attended a presentation by an independent investigative team on the JFK assassination while a student at Missouri Southern State University.   This team, had all the video, photos….etc and gave a very convincing accounting of the killing.   They believed it was a conspiracy and that Oswald did not act alone, it wasn’t possible.  They didn’t know who fired the shots, but their presentation pretty much blew the Warren Commission’s findings out of the water! I have been fascinated ever since.

I only mention this book now, for those interested.



%d bloggers like this: