Has Congress taken the legal term “perjury” out of their books, it is no longer an offense or so it seems? Seems so, if not they may want to because there is no point in having it if you are not going to abide by it or prosecute those that commit perjury. I understand it would need to applied to their members as much as anyone………..often more often!
What is the point in raising your right hand before all to tell the truth. It has become a pathetic joke.
Amy C. Barrett was refreshing!
Reblogged this on boudica.us.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on kommonsentsjane and commented:
Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.
They protect each other. The rumor has it – that is why AG Barr is stuttering because the word is that it would look bad on the country if they jailed all of the should be jail birds flying around in Washington – especially the main black bird. Now don’t go and call me a “racists.” It is what it is!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It looks bad if he (Barr) doesn’t as it places him in bed with them if he does not. We have plenty of able people to fill the slots.
LikeLiked by 1 person
THE GOVERNMENT HAS BECOME NOTHING BUT A GROUP OF DIFFERENT CLICKS, AND TO EACH GROUP OF CLICK, IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THEM TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT THEIR CLICK. SOMETIMES YOU HAVE ONE SET OF CLICK THAT RIVALS AND PREVAILS WAR ON ANOTHER. THEY ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN STREET GANGS AND THUGS, OTHER THAN THEY PERVERT AND TWIST THE LAW TO THEIR ADVANTAGE. SOONER OR LATER YOU NEVER KNOW, WE JUST MAY SEE A REAL SHOOT OUT. THEN WE CAN ASK THE QUESTION OF GUN CONTROL
LikeLiked by 1 person