WAS THERE HATE CRIME ON THE ST. LOUIS METRO?


Metrolink screengrab

A man was beaten on March 23 on the St. Louis Metro Link train.

“What do you think of the cop killing Michael Brown situation?”    The St. Louis (where else) Metro Link rider didn’t give the politically correct answer, then got beat-up.  With that question or statement, depending on how you look at it, and that the victim was white and the two attackers were black, wasn’t enough to be determined a hate crime.  So just what does it take to be considered a hate crime?

The 43-year-old male was seated on the Metro, three young black males were standing nearby.   The 15-year-old ask the man if he could use his cell phone; he was told no.   Then the kid ask the man what he thought of the police killing Michael Brown and the investigation situation.  The seated man said something to the effect “I haven’t given it much thought”.   The kid suddenly turned into a 15-year-old punk……he proceeded to slug a seated man in somewhat of a defenseless position.   A 21-year-old companion also punched and kicked at the passenger.   A third companion of the two attackers stood by and just watched.  When the train came to its next stop, the three ran off, like the cowards they are.

Was it a hate crime?  I don’t know in the context that hate crimes are meant.   I mean hate crime, isn’t that really the same as racial or religious and ethnic hate (bias motivated crime)?    If this man was beaten because of his view or non-view of the Michael Brown stage, race is definitely involved.   Much of what occurred in Ferguson last Summer was about race, right Al Sharpton, right Holder and yes Obama?   Hate crime charges will not be filed.   The 21-year-old has been charged, with assault, the 15-year-old was turned over to juvenile authorities.

Did the 15-year-old bait his victim, test him?   Asking to use his cell phone, was it to see if the man would stand-up to him by saying no, or just give it up.   Was it a test to see how friendly the man was?  I don’t think in this case it was.   To followup with the question of Michael Brown, the kid wanted an answer to instigate trouble,   possibly to see if the man had nerve to say what he really thought.   His answer was middle ground to avoid a confrontation.   The passenger thought he was playing it safe.   The kid found someone passive he could pound on and beat.   That was obvious, the man didn’t fight back, only slightly raised his arm as a shield to protect his head.   He was in a seated position and he was out numbered.   No one, not one individual gave him any assistance.

Hate crime is a separate charge all of its own and can be complicated.   The definition of hate crime can vary from state to state.     The act of beating someone can be a hateful act, and does not need to be motivated by bias.  The phrase “hate crime” is a poorly selected title.   Like I said earlier, it is meant to be a bias motivated crime; but it doesn’t have to be.    Some hateful people hate everyone, no bias there, they hate everyone.   A man can kill his father-in-law out of pure hate.   They don’t charge him with hate crime, they charge him with murder.

Hate crime, one of those poorly selected phrases to get it politically correct.    Assault is assault, rape is rape, arson is arson.  I have no problem with additional charges brought against someone for killing a man because he was black or white or Jewish……whatever.   Why not call it a “Biasly Motivated Crime”.    Hate crime can get complicated, and with legality issues someone could get off, escape the charge.   Bias motivated, more to the point.   Hate and bias have a lot in common, but there can be differences.

One more point I would like to make, the 43-year-old turned the other cheek.   Maybe he’s a better man than me, but he could use a lesson in self-defense.   I know he shielded himself, but I can’t see myself in that same situation remaining seated.   It would have been a war.   That is what cowards do though, prey on a weak and sometimes a person in a defenseless position.

 

Advertisements

Why Won’t The Benghazi Committee Compel Hillary To Testify?


Gowdy stop pussy footing! Publically interview Hillary, not privately, otherwise the public will suspect this only assists a cover-up of Clinton/Obama on Benghazi.

PA Pundits - International

McCarthyBy Andrew C McCarthy ~

As one who was very pleased by the selection of Representative Trey Gowdy (R., S.C.) to chair the Benghazi Select Committee, I hate to seem like I’m haranguing him (see, e.g., here and here; but see also here). His investigative decisions, however, continue to be baffling.

AA - HillaryThe latest development in the Hillary Clinton e-mail saga is the disclosure by her private attorney, David Kendall, that she has deleted all e-mail from the private server on which she improperly conducted government business while she was secretary of state. (See Shannen Coffin’s latest legal analysis regarding laws potentially broken by Mrs. Clinton here.) In light of the obvious ramifications this has for the Benghazi investigation, Fox News’s Greta Van Susteren asked Chairman Gowdy what he intended to do about it. Gowdy responded:

We’re going to have a conversation with Secretary Clinton. I would hope that it…

View original post 1,726 more words

KOMMONSENTSJANE – ONE WORLD ORDER


Who can we trade these 5 to?

kommonsentsjane

Following are some videos which speaks to the topic of One World Order and just think about how you feel about our own politicians, behind our back and  using our money, plotting this evil deed and going against Christianity entirely.  Kissinger went so far as to say that Obama was put in place to achieve the One World Order by both Bush’s and then the Clinton’s.  It certainly rang a bell when the elderly Bush started palling around with the Clinton’s and then the younger Bush.  What strange bedfellows?  So now this group of One World Order is not any different from Hitler.  They were plotting against America the whole time.  What hypocrites!

Everything Kissinger is saying is totalitarian, collectivist, Satanic world government. Don’t think it’s ‘Satanic’?Take a good hard look at Hollywood and tell me that it isn’t completely Satanic.  There are people who have  worked in film and…

View original post 280 more words

KOMMONSENTSJANE – MARTIAL LAW DRILL CAUGHT ON CAMERA


Practice against who? ISIS, probably not, American citizens….yes; especially those with guns that are not going to give them up. Practice against dummies and role players is one thing, the real thing won’t go so smooth.

kommonsentsjane

http://www.infowars.com/video-shows-troops-training-to-intern-citizens-in-fort-lauderdale/?AID=7236

Video Shows Troops Training to Intern Citizens in Fort Lauderdale

Martial law-style drill caught on camera.  Is this to frighten the people?

by Paul Joseph Watson | March 29, 2015

Footage out of Fort Lauderdale, Florida shot earlier this week shows military and law enforcement practicing the internment of citizens during martial-law style training.

The clip shows armed troops arresting role players on the street before a column of prisoners are marched towards a mock internment facility. Black Hawk choppers are also seen whizzing between buildings.

The exercise was accompanied by very little media coverage. A Sun-Sentinel report said that Broward County police would be “assisting members of the U.S. Special Operations Forces who are undergoing urban warfare training.”

The drill, which was held in locations the military refused to disclose beforehand, began on March 17 and ended on Friday. 200 military personnel from all four branches, Air Force…

View original post 171 more words

BARACK OBAMA, HILLARY CLINTON REUNITED AT WHITE HOUSE MEETING


Barack probably drilled Hillary on how many of those deleted (but can be recovered) emials lead back to him?

imageWASHINGTON, D.C. (The Adobo Chronicles) – President Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton met privately at the White House for about an hour Monday afternoon.

The White House says the former rivals-turned-colleagues discussed “a range of issues” that included Clinton’s personal emails controversy.

The Adobo Chronicles can now confirm with certainty that 2016 was not among the issues discussed.

Our inside sources, however, confirmed that after the private meeting, Clinton was seen touring the various rooms at The White House, including the Lincoln Bedroom, the Oval Office and the State Banquet Hall with her private interior decorator.

In addition, she asked to be shown the White House room where the email server is located.

Finally, she was treated to a ‘taste test’ of sample menus from White House Executive Chef, Filipina American Cristeta Comerford.

You know, in the likely event that she and Bill will have a homecoming in…

View original post 1 more word

GOWDY SHOULD BRING HILLARY IN, NOW!


2015-03-15_1120 Hillary Clinton

This is my opinion but, Hillary Clinton is not going to voluntarily meet with Trey Gowdy and the Benghazi Committee.  To most of you that may be calling me Mr. Obvious and 1 + 1 = 2.    

Rep. Gowdy is giving Hillary too much room.   He has given her until May 1st to meet for an interview.  Bring her in, Benghazi didn’t happen yesterday.  I know she has been interviewed once, another time, but she wasn’t serious then, we didn’t know or suspect as much.  That doesn’t mean she’ll take the Committee serious now, she has a huge I am above the law and everyone else attitude.  Speaking with forked tongue was easier then for the Arkansas Princess.  She’ll have a new set of questions.   The answers will get more difficult, she has more to hide than just emails.   Hillary has some “Hard Choices” to make, that doesn’t mean what she chooses to tell can be taken as the truth.   She has a history of being less than honest.  That is understated.  She doesn’t get the benefit of the doubt, she has had that long enough. 

Gowdy should skip the invitation approach, go directly through the House now, don’t threaten her, just do it. 

I have some blogger and author friends will tell me “Arlin be patient, let the Committee and Gowdy play their cards.”.    After years of contempt, unlawfulness and corruption that goes back to at least the days Hillary served on the Watergate committee, that she was fired from, how much more patience do we have to have.   Enough is enough.   Hillary Clinton and the Clinton clan should not be an issue, they should be in prison where you or I would be.    And yes friends, there is a trail of other former office holders that should be there too.   We aren’t talking about them today.